Our expert team at Squee conducts a thorough evaluation to pinpoint how your site can perform better.
Overall, the automated checks look really good.
Your score is Fantastic. This usually means most visitors can use the page without issues.
From the automated scans, your site looks in great shape. Nothing was flagged this run.
IMPORTANT: automated scans catch around half of accessibility issues. The rest needs a manual expert review against WCAG 2.2 AA. See how our accessibility audits work, and for transparency, here's exactly how your score was calculated.
Your score looks good, but automated tools can only check around half of what matters. A manual review covers the rest — reading order, screen reader behaviour, and full WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
No key issues were detected by the automated checks.
Links that don’t explain themselves: Link text works, but some links may be repetitive or unclear. Tidying these would improve clarity.
this mainly affects people who use software that reads websites out loud, for example someone who is blind or has low vision. A common way they navigate is by pulling up a list of links on the page, and if links are blank, vague, or repeated (like lots of “Read more”), that list becomes meaningless, so it's hard to tell which link goes where.
Image descriptions (alt text): Images have alternative text, but some descriptions may be overly long or repetitive. A quick tidy up would improve clarity for screen reader users.
this mainly affects people who use software that reads websites out loud, for example someone who is blind or has low vision. If an image has no description, the device may just say “image”, so they miss what the picture is showing or what an image button does, and if important words are inside the image they may miss that information completely.
Text that’s hard to read (low colour contrast): Automated contrast detection did not return reliable results for this page (commonly happens on sites whose colours are defined via CSS variables). This needs a manual contrast check before we can confirm it passes.
this mainly affects people with low vision, colour blindness, or deteriorating vision. When the text colour is too close to the background colour, it can become really hard to read, especially on a phone or in bright light, and some people won't be able to read it at all.
Text is a readable size: No very small text was flagged by the automated checks.
this mainly affects people with low vision or deteriorating vision. If text is too small, people have to zoom in and scroll more, which makes the page feel like hard work and makes key information easier to miss.
Forms without clear field labels: No forms were detected on this page, so form labels are not relevant here.
this mainly affects people who use software that reads websites out loud, for example someone who is blind or has low vision, and people who need very clear instructions, for example someone with a learning disability. A label is the text that tells you what a box is for, like “Email address”, and if it's missing, unclear, or disappears when you type, it's easy to forget what each box means and make mistakes.
Keyboard navigation: A manual check suggests key parts of the page can be used with a keyboard.
this mainly affects people who can't use a mouse, for example someone with limited hand movement, pain from repetitive strain, or someone who is blind or has low vision. If the site can't be used properly with the keyboard (for example Tab, Enter, and Space), people can get stuck on menus, buttons, or forms and be unable to complete key actions like making an enquiry.
Page sections that don’t follow a clear order (headings): Headings are present, which gives the page a basic structure for screen readers and keyboard users.
this mainly affects people who use software that reads websites out loud, for example someone who is blind or has low vision. Headings act like a contents list, so people can jump between sections quickly, and if the heading levels jump around it becomes harder to understand the page structure and find sections like services, pricing, or contact details.
Form questions that aren’t grouped clearly: No automated grouping issues were flagged for form questions.
this mainly affects people who find long forms tiring or confusing, for example someone with ADHD, a learning disability, or memory difficulties. When related questions aren't grouped, the form can feel like one long list, which makes it harder to follow and easier to miss something important.
Video and audio alternatives (captions/transcripts): No HTML5 video or audio elements were flagged by the automated checks.
this mainly affects people who are Deaf or have hearing loss, and anyone who can't have sound on. Without captions or a written alternative, important information in a video or audio clip can be missed.
Page regions are clearly defined (landmarks): The page exposes landmarks or regions, which helps assistive technology users jump around the page.
this mainly affects people who use software that reads websites out loud, for example someone who is blind or has low vision. These tools use page regions like navigation, main content, and footer as jump points, so without them people may have to listen through lots of content to reach what they need.
Hidden labels and instructions for controls (ARIA): ARIA attributes are present. Automated checks do not show specific ARIA errors here.
this mainly affects people who use assistive technology, for example someone who is blind or has low vision. Buttons, icons, and menus often need hidden labels so these tools can explain what they do, and if those labels are missing or wrong, the page can sound confusing or misleading even if it looks fine.
Page language is set: A language has been set for the page, which helps screen readers choose the right voice.
this mainly affects people who use software that reads websites out loud, for example someone who is blind or has low vision. If the page language isn't set, the voice can use the wrong pronunciation rules, which makes the content harder to follow.
